Team provides
- one recurring engineering workflow
- current manual baseline
- repo/tools touched
- success metric
- approval boundary
- handoff target
14-day engineering-agent pilot
Qualify one recurring engineering workflow before agents touch real repos.
AgentFoundry turns one Issue-to-PR, code-review, test/debug, dependency, security, or release workflow into a governed coding-agent pilot with a blueprint, scoped tools, approval gates, review evidence, and a human owner decision.
AgentFoundry delivers
- Agent blueprint
- repo/tool/data connections
- governance rules
- tool permission plan
- execution plan
- verification gates
- execution records
- Evidence Report samples
- risk register
- safe-stop notes
- human approval checklist
Qualification gate
Submit the workflowA good first engineering agent has pain, repeatability, repo access, and evidence.
The intake forces the minimum evidence needed to avoid vague pilots: baseline, success metric, repo/tools touched, and approval boundary.
Pain fit
The engineering workflow has a named owner, visible baseline, repeated delay, review burden, risk, or quality loss worth reducing.
System fit
Repos, tools, data, CI, cloud, documents, and handoff targets can be scoped behind explicit permissions.
Evidence fit
The pilot can produce traces, checks, changed files, approval logs, risk notes, and a PR, retry, narrow, or stop decision.
Acceptance evidence
The pilot ends with a PR, retry, narrow, or stop decision.
These records decide whether the agent should create a PR, propose a release handoff, retry, narrow, or stop.
✓One engineering workflow, one owner, one baseline, one measurable handoff
✓Repos touched, tool permissions, and human approval gates are explicit
✓Representative issues have traces and changed files
✓Quality checks include failures, not only wins
✓Safe-stop, monitoring, and improvement loop are documented
Pilot candidates
Qualify my workflowStart where engineering work is repetitive, reviewable, and governance-sensitive.
The best first agent has clear inputs, outputs, ownership, policy boundaries, verification gates, safe-stop needs, and a visible manual baseline.
Issue-to-PR Workflow
Turn a scoped issue into plan, branch, diff, checks, risk notes, and PR-ready handoff.
Code Review Workflow
Inspect a branch or PR, find defects, check style and architecture rules, and produce review comments.
Test and Debug Workflow
Keep context across failing tests, logs, hypotheses, retries, fixes, and safe-stop decisions.
Dependency Upgrade Workflow
Upgrade a package, adjust code, run regressions, and prepare safe-stop notes.
Security Fix Workflow
Investigate an authorized codebase, suggest bounded fixes, run checks, and ask before PR or deploy steps.
Modernization Workflow
Translate legacy code, dependencies, or architecture decisions into small checked diffs and release notes.
Documentation Workflow
Update design notes, API docs, architecture summaries, and release handoff notes from actual code changes.
Blank Engineering Agent
Describe one recurring engineering job, define tools and approval rules, and turn it into a governed agent blueprint.
Foundry sprint plan
From engineering intent to governed coding-agent pilot.
The pilot proves whether one agent workflow can remove enough engineering work to justify hardening, release handoff, and expansion.
Day 1Pick one real engineering task and define what the owner needs the coding agent to accomplish.
Days 2–4Create the agent blueprint, connect repo/tools/data, set approval gates, and choose an execution target.
Days 5–10Run real or representative issues, collect review evidence, failures, escalations, owner feedback, and measurable time saved.
Days 11–13Tighten permissions, escalation rules, template copy, report fields, and stop/revert behavior.
Day 14Deliver a usable engineering agent, Evidence Report samples, owner guide, management controls, and next template recommendation.
Private engineering pilot intake
Share the engineering workflow to qualify first.
Submit the workflow, manual baseline, success metric, repo/tools touched, approval boundary, constraints, and handoff target.
What happens after you submit
The first reply is a scope check, not a sales deck.
We use the intake to confirm the workflow, urgency, wanted next step, approval boundary, and evidence needed. If there is fit, the next step is the narrowest pilot plan for one engineering job.
First workload
Issue-to-PR is the first proof workload.
A repo-connected workflow can investigate a task or failed build, propose a patch, run verification, capture risk, and hand off an Evidence Report for human approval. This is now the company entry path, not a side example.
Day 1Pick one real engineering task and define what the owner needs the coding agent to accomplish.
Days 2–4Create the agent blueprint, connect repo/tools/data, set approval gates, and choose an execution target.
Days 5–10Run real or representative issues, collect review evidence, failures, escalations, owner feedback, and measurable time saved.
Days 11–13Tighten permissions, escalation rules, template copy, report fields, and stop/revert behavior.
Day 14Deliver a usable engineering agent, Evidence Report samples, owner guide, management controls, and next template recommendation.